COM Research Colloquium Series

The Communication Research Colloquium Series at Boston University was established in October 2009. This series consists of monthly research presentations that highlight current and original research of faculty in the College of Communication. This forum provides an intellectual exchange of ideas and perspectives, features scholarship in several methodological traditions, and fosters discussions among faculty and students about a variety of research topics in the field of communication.


Upcoming Lectures


Past Lectures

Taking Images Seriously

MARIA BETSI GRABE, PHD
Dalton Family Professor and Director of Emerging Media Studies
December 2024

As the capacity for Al generated images proliferates, the public consternation about deepfakes seems disproportionate to concerns expressed about Al-driven linguistic utility or software development. This visual-linguistic schism is also observable in research.

Most predictive models of knowledge acquisition and active citizenship are still anchored in the Gutenberg legacy of linguistic primacy. Yet multimodal media environments with life-like full motion images and sound are arguably as central to contemporary life as the printed word has been for the past five centuries.

This talk will meander through natural history, contemporary research on human cognition, differences between image and linguistic communication, and arrive at the simple conclusion that images should be taken seriously.


Social Class, Taste Cultures, Media Preference and Political Allegiance in the 2024 United States

CHRIS WELLS, PHD
Associate Dean of Faculty Development; Associate Professor of Emerging Media Studies
November 2024

Defining social class in the United States has been a puzzle for over two hundred years, and class has always had complex interactions with political power. This is all the more true in 2024; the presidential election results are expected to show significant reconfiguration of the relationship between certain core constituents of social class—economic wealth and race—and partisan politics. Elsewhere in our culture, we have seen the steadily growing politicization of a wide range of consumer preferences, from clothing to automobiles to entertainment, not to mention proliferating partisan media and social media.

How can we understand social class, the consumer practices that help to constitute it, and political media in 2024? This presentation will discuss work in progress from a project that takes intellectual inspiration from sociologists Pierre Bourdieu and Michael Savage and aims to (1) provide a typology of American social class based on individuals’ levels of economic and cultural capital (in particular, tastes for particular consumer objects); and (2) relate those social classes to political and media preferences.

In this talk, I will discuss the theory that informs the project, two primary methods (correspondence analysis and latent class analysis of survey data), and preliminary results.linguistic primacy. Yet multimodal media environments with life-like full motion images and sound are arguably as central to contemporary life as the printed word has been for the past five centuries.


Physiological Response to Political Ads:The Influence of Partisan and Issue Congruence on Attention and Emotion

H. DENIS WU, PHD
Professor, Department of Mass Communication, Advertisingand Public Relations
September 2024

Political advertisements are a mainstay of electoral campaigns. Voters’ physiological responses to political advertisements can disclose genuine campaign effects, but they are hardly studied.

This talk will report an experimental study that employed eye-tracking and facial expression analyses to gauge voters’ cognitive and affective responses to real campaign ads that are focused on specific issues and sponsored by different political entities.

The findings shed light on questions including: Do voters’ party affiliation and issue concern influence their attention and emotional response to political ads? To what extent do self-report and physiological measures match? Do whether positive or negative emotions drive voting decisions?