Home

The Impact of Supervised Drug Injection Sites on Public Safety

By cpersonJune 22nd, 2020

The Impact of Supervised Drug Injection Sites on Public Safety

Over 70,000 people died as a result of a drug overdose in the United States in 2017.  Drug overdose deaths now exceed those caused by firearms, car accidents, homicides, or HIV/AIDS (SCS, n.d.).  As drug-related deaths continue to rise, many cities find themselves seeking alternative methods to address the problem.  Proposals to open supervised (or safe) injection sites are being introduced in many state legislatures. 

A supervised injection site is a place where drug users can use illegal substances with trained professionals on hand to respond in the case of an overdose.  Typically, drug users come in with their own drugs and are given clean needles and a clean, safe space to consume them.  Trained professionals are available to provide breathing masks, naloxone, and to provide safer injection advice and information about drug treatment and other health services (Gordon, 2018).  Staff members do not directly assist in consumption or handle any drugs brought in by users. 

There are currently over 100 supervised injections sites operating throughout the world with the majority of them located in Europe.  There are currently no safe injection sites legally operating in the United States.  Several American cities, such as New York City, Philadelphia, Seattle, and San Francisco, are leading the way in advocating for supervised injection sites as a response to the opioid epidemic.  Such a unique and extreme proposal has stirred up a controversy entangling existing laws with varying public opinions on the matter.  The controversy of whether or not to sanction and fund such programs is currently being debated in many state legislatures with hopes to begin opening facilities as soon as 2019. 

The concept of supervised injection sites is highly controversial due to the stigma attached to substance abuse issues and its conflict with current state and federal laws.  The public and political concerns are clear:  supervised injection sites promote drug use, they will bring drug users to the neighborhoods they are located in, it is morally and legally wrong to encourage drug use, and so on (Cohen, 2018).  Conflict ensues when this perceived enabling of illegal drug use is weighed against the potential positive impact of reducing overdose deaths.  State legislatures are now attempting to navigate the murky waters surrounding the establishment of safe injection sites while considering the legality, potential harms to society and the potential benefits to addicts. 

 

References

Cohen, J.  (2018).  Supervised injection facilities face obstacles, but that shouldn’t stop them.  Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20181127.121405/full/

Gordon, E.  (2018).  What’s the evidence that supervised drug injection sites saves lives.  Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/09/07/645609248/whats-the-evidence-that-supervised-drug-injection-sites-save-lives

Supervised Consumption Sites. (n.d.).  Retrieved from http://www.drugpolicy.org/issues/supervised-consumption-services

Trauma in juvenile offenders

By Melinda PlucknetteJune 21st, 2020in CJ 720

One critical risk-factor leading people to the criminal justice system is trauma. An estimated 93% of youths involved in the system have a history of trauma (Maschi & Schwalbe, 2012, p 21). The earlier that trauma can be addressed, the less likely someone is to later become involved in the legal system. The American Psychological Association (2020) defines trauma as “an emotional response to a terrible event like an accident, rape, or natural disaster. Immediately after the event, shock and denial are typical. Longer term reactions include unpredictable emotions, flashbacks, strained relationships, and even physical symptoms like headaches or nausea. While these feelings are normal, some people have difficulty moving on with their lives.” Some other examples of traumatic events, specifically involving juveniles, include physical assault, witnessing violence or death, the death of a loved one, and family or school problems (Maschi et al., 2012, p 21).

Following exposure to trauma or stressful experiences, adolescents may struggle with emotional, psychological, or behavioral problems which can lead to high-risk behaviors later on in life (Maschi et al., 2012, p 21). Due to their lack of coping mechanisms, these adolescents may also develop substance abuse issues, which is an additional risk-factor for entering the criminal justice system (Maschi et al., 2012, p 21). Other risk factors include issues at school, younger age at first offense, intellectual level, familial dysfunction, poverty, and family substance abuse, mental health, or legal issues (Greenwald, 2002, p 179). It is necessary for agencies to implement trauma-informed interventions due to the high rate of trauma present in juveniles within the justice system (Maschi et al., 2012, pp 21-22).

Youths involved in the criminal justice system are frequently sentenced to probation supervision versus incarceration, which necessitates the need for programs and services to address trauma and stressful events. Probation officers utilize enforcement of court orders as well as case management techniques to reduce criminogenic risk factors and increase resiliency (Maschi et al., 2012, p 22). State assessments, referrals to treatment programs and direct counseling are techniques that many probation officers implement to harvest success in their client (Mashi et al., 2012, p 22).

Probationers who are non-compliant with their court order are usually threatened by negative sanctions ranging from increased reporting, a violation of probation, or incarceration. Incarceration and isolation may only intensify the pre-existing trauma. As such, alternative approaches are necessary. Mashi et al. (2012) suggest using techniques that involve problem-solving, incentives, counseling and persuasion, such as motivational interviewing (p 22).

Maschi et al. (2012) recommend using trauma-informed assessments as an intervention tool in probation (p 27). By utilizing a trauma screening instrument, probation officers can tailor the services they refer. Mashi et al. (2012) also found that a “supportive, empathic approach” may persuade a juvenile to engage in the recommended treatment programs (p 28). Nelson and Vincent (2018) indicate that juvenile offenders who received services relating to their criminogenic needs based off assessments were 50% less likely to reoffend later in life, which supports the criticalness in addressing trauma and substance abuse in juveniles (p 1137-1138). Miller and Bornstein (2012) indicate that involvement in the legal system can sometimes produce positive results if the individual is able to learn coping skills, relaxation techniques, and utilizes positive social supports (p 3).

Cognitive-behavioral treatment methods are found to be effective in reducing recidivism. Role-playing and art therapy are frequently introduced during treatment due to cognitive and language differences in adolescents (Greenwald, 2002, p 179). Additional effective therapeutic interventions include exposure-based treatments (Greenwald, 2002, p 181).

Effective treatments for trauma also include skills training and therapeutic exposure. Skill training incorporates self-care, relaxation and meditation, role-playing, positive self-talk and reconstructing thoughts in a rational manner (Greenwald, 2002, p 181). Skills training also focuses on social skills, problem-solving methods, self-esteem, and violence (Greenwald, 2002, p 181). Exposure therapy includes desensitization, flooding, prolonged exposure, or Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) (Greenwald, 2002, p 181-182). Motivation-Adaptive Skills-Trauma Resolution (MASTR) treatment is an intervention that has been proven to reduce stress, stress-related symptoms, and undesirable behavior while improving school performance (Greenwald, 2002, p 252). The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2018) reports juveniles with strong peer social supports can strengthen positive relationships and recovery through mentoring, coaching, recovery groups, or community building (p 11).

While having involvement in the criminal justice system at a young age can have a negative impact on a juvenile offender, it may ultimately produce a positive outcome. By properly addressing and treating issues surrounding substance abuse, school, home environment, and mental health, specifically trauma, the less likely the juvenile is to reoffend later on in life. There are a variety of treatments that have been proven effective in adolescent populations including cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, EMDR, MASTR, role playing, art therapy, and skills training. These therapeutic interventions may also involve group therapy, which has been proven effective in reducing recidivism and trauma through positive social supports. Overall, juvenile offenders suffering from trauma can ultimately become successful if they are properly assessed at frequent intervals using reliable measurements, the services they are connected to appropriately match their needs, and they create and maintain positive social supports.

 

References:

American Psychological Association. (2020). Trauma. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/topics/trauma/

Greenwald, R. (Ed.). (2002). Trauma and juvenile delinquency: theory, research, and interventions. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group.

Mashi, T., & Schwalbe, C. (2012 Jun 27). Unraveling probation officers’ practices with youths with histories of trauma and stressful life events. Social Work research 36(1), 21-30. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bu.edu/10.1093/swr/svs007

Miller, M.K., & Bornstein, B.H. (2013). Stress, trauma and wellbeing in the legal system: where do we go from here? Oxford Scholarship Online, 1-19. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829996.001.0001

Nelson, R.J., & Vincent, G.M. (2018 Jun 27). Matching services to criminogenic needs following comprehensive risk assessment implementation in juvenile probation. Sage Journals, 45(8), 1136-1153. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bu.edu/10.1177/0093854818780923

The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2018 Apr). Reentry starts here: A guide for youth in long-term juvenile corrections and treatment programs. https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo115339/251193.pdf

Vassar, G. (2019 Jan 15). How judges are becoming trauma-informed [image attached]. https://i2.wp.com/lakesidelink.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/bigstock-Depressing-Girl-Sits-On-The-F-238218223.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&ssl=1

Tagged: , ,

Family Trauma, Media and Police Interactions

By palrJune 20th, 2020

Police interactions with the public have always been a highly conversed issue. Recently, due to events in the United States, there has been an increase scrutiny in regards to police interactions with the public. The media and the general public have been quick to glorify the notion that police are under-trained and not equipped to effectively deal with the public. One negative interaction with the public can ultimately affect the public’s perception of a police service.

Recently in the Region of Peel (region directly west of Toronto, Canada) officers have been scrutinized for their interaction with D’Andre Campbell, a 26 year old man. Officers responded to a home for the report of a domestic incident. This incident then escalated to the point where two officer’s tasered Campbell, this was then followed by one of the officers discharging his firearm multiple times. Campbell was pronounced dead at the scene. (CBC News, 2020).

Immediately after this incident, Campbell’s family called for more mental health training:

“According to the family, D'Andre Campbell was the one who called police to the home Monday. They said he had mental health issues and that police have been to the home numerous times in the past, so they should have known they were dealing with a mental health patient.” (Tong, 2020).

This statement led to immense media coverage on the issue, and the family appeared devastated and traumatized due to the interaction. The investigation is still on going and the Special Investigations Unit (SIU, civilian police oversight agency) has not yet released a report on their findings. The Toronto Star had been faulted for releasing a news article which stated Campbell as “unarmed.” (Yun, 2020). This news source attempted to scrutinize the officer’s for their interaction with a black man, and had to post a correction notice to their news article.

It is understandable for the public and family to be upset in regards to what has happened. However, it is unacceptable for media outlets to attempt to capitalize on the trauma that a family has experienced, and sway public opinion towards statements which are contradictory to facts. For example, in the City of Toronto, Toronto Police responded to approximately 1.8 million calls for service in 2016. Officers made approximately 9,000 mental health act apprehensions and 28,000 arrests. The SIU investigated 1 incident for every 27,729 contacts that police had with the public, and use of force was only required in a total of 3.9% of the services total arrests. (Vigilis, 2017). This shows that despite how the media wants to portray incidents, police are doing a relatively good job in deescalating situations and peacefully resolving incidents.

References:

CBC News. (2020, April 8). Man fatally shot by Peel police in Brampton identified as D'Andre Campbell. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/brampton-shooting-d-andre-campbell-1.5527245

Tong, T. (2020, April 7). 'He was already on the floor': Family looks for answers after Ontario man shot dead by police. CTV News. Retrieved from https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/he-was-already-on-the-floor-family-looks-for-answers-after-ontario-man-shot-dead-by-police-1.4886751

Vigilis, S. (2017). Corporate Risk Management Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/publications/files/reports/crm2016annualreport.pdf

Yun, T. (2020, April 9). Peel police chief offers condolences after man fatally shot by police, acknowledges ‘issues of trust in policing.’ Toronto Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2020/04/09/peel-police-chief-offers-condolences-after-man-fatally-shot-by-police-acknowledges-issues-of-trust-in-policing.html

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Post Incarceration

By lynnesJune 18th, 2020in CJ 720

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Post Incarceration 

 People enter into the prison system beaten battered and bruised by life. Trauma isn’t new for them. With little care and resources within many states, jails and prisons are the largest mental health providers in many counties and states (Rousseau, 2020)  The trauma that is survived for many will become a form of PTSD-Post traumatic stress disorder. 

a condition of persistent mental and emotional stress occurring as a result of injury or severe psychological shock, typically involving disturbance of sleep and constant vivid recall of the experience, with dulled responses to others and to the outside world.” (OXford)

Of the 10.3 million prisoners worldwide approximately 750,000 are likely to have a clinical diagnosis of PTSD. (Branyi, Cassidy, Fazel, Priebe, & Mundt, 2018). PTSD conditions can often go unnoticed and may lay dormant for years before a life situation triggers it to the surface. The  prison systems breed traumatic events, stressors, fear and psychological harm. Prison adversely impacts self-esteem, self worth, cognition and the human spirit. (Flood, 2018)  While incarcerated many painful and devastating past memories may often be awakened due to the harsh conditions of a dehumanizing, uncaring lifestyle that prison life offers. These memories of past traumatic experiences, may cause a person to undergo crippling emotional reactions and pain. (Thomas, 2019)

Being incarcerated in general is traumatizing, the inhuman treatment, lack of compassion and suffrage of the daily routine is most difficult to survive but then you add past trauma coming to surface and living in repeated trauma daily. It is no surprise that  each year more than 700,000 people leave prison having undergone a traumatic experience. When emerging from the prison system, many will return to society undiagnosed and untreated. (Flood, 2018)

Many will enter society unaware that they are institutionalized.  “Institutionalization is used to describe the process by which inmates are shaped and transformed by the institutional environments in which they live.” (Rousseau, 2020) When a person enters the prison system they are required to conform to the everyday occurrence, if not they will be forced to obey the norms of the prison system. One must incorporate the norms of prison into their way of thinking and behaving. Prison is it’s own society with its own set of rules and protocol. The way you feel, the way you act, the way you interact needs to fall into step with the prison norms. This personal transformation is called ‘Institutionalization” It happens differently for each individual. The longer the person is sentenced, the more significant the transformation, weather consciously or unconsciously they are becoming ‘institutionalized”.  It may happen over time or after several altercations/penalties. It is a forced conformity into an environment that has no privacy, no compassion, where you are deprived of emotion, touch, while controlled and dehumanized. (Rousseau, 2020)

It goes without saying that when a person is released life is no longer the same. You couple that with the loss of self identity, being labeled as a criminal, stigmatized as a felon, denied by society and you have a challenging transition into society. Support network through Reentry agencies provides a safe space for post-incarceration adjustment to take place. It allows people a chance to reacclimate into an environment where they have no judgement (Flood, 2018). Prison reentry programs provide a sense of belonging, structure and support for people coming out of prison. A program offers compassion, empathy and they are being treated as a human being. Again they are going through an adjustment to a new norm. A new sense of worth. The support of others is critical at this time. 

As people find their way back into society's norms some may need something that has a meaning for them. They may choose to go into a field of work that allows them to help the next person. Thus giving them a sense of value and purpose. For others, being the voice for the ones left behind allows them to share their stories to educate and bring change for the ones left behind. (Flood, 2018)

PTSD is often a part of people’s lives and increases during release. Therefore, It is important as a community to open our hearts and minds to people who are returning to their communities. Support systems and compassion can make the difference between success and recidivism. 

References

Branyi, G., Cassidy, M., Fazel, S., Priebe, S., & Mundt, A. P. (2018). Prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Prisoners. Epidemiologic reviews, 40(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxx015

Flood, F. (2018). Reframing Trauma: The Transformative Power of Meaning in Life, Work, and Community. Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Disorders, 02(05). doi:10.26502/jppd.2572-519x0052 Retreived from http://www.fortunejournals.com/articles/preframing-trauma-the-transformative-power-of-meaning-in-life-work-and-communityp.pdf

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Definition of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com.(n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/definition/post-traumatic_stress_disorder

Rousseau, D.  (2020) Lecture notes, Module 6:  Trauma and the Criminal Justice System Retrieved from:  https://onlinecampus.bu.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-7783372-dt-content-rid-37966315_1/courses/20sum1metcj720so1/course/module6/allpages.htm

Thomas, Liji. (2019, February 27). Prisoner Post Traumatic Stress. News-Medical. Retrieved on June 15, 2020 from https://www.news-medical.net/health/Prisoner-Post-Traumatic-Stress.aspx.

Strategies of Self-Care in Trauma

By jamie123June 17th, 2020in CJ 720

Strategies of Self-Care in Trauma

Trauma is collective to more than fifty per cent of the population, with a large per cent of traumatic events leading to mental disorders such as PTSD, depression, as well as inter-relation problems (Dorothy, 2017). Due to the intensity of the consequences of trauma, individuals experiencing this ordeal are advised to practice self-care to enhance their wellbeing. Self-care improves recovery through enhancing positive relationships and interactions between the patient and care providers. The paper will evaluate strategies for self-care to individuals experiencing trauma.

Self-Care Strategies

Self-care strategies can be grouped into three strategies; physical, relational, plus cognitive (Patricia et al., 2013). Physical strategies include physical exercises such as running, dance, and yoga, among others. These strategies are aimed at providing progressive relaxation methods to enable the patients to focus on something different. During exercise, there is deep breathing, exhaustion, and relaxation of muscles which gives an individual a new experience of thoughts, besides the traumatic ones. If an individual does not like exercises, one can go shopping, cook, or having an undisturbed sleep. The practices help in dealing with intense feelings plus emotions.

Relational strategies involve building trusting relationships among friends, peers, workmates, romantic partners, supervisors, or therapist (Patricia et al., 2013). Genuine relationships provide physical, emotional, and cognitive support. When a traumatic individual is in a relationship, they trust the people with their fears by confiding their feelings and emotions. Some individuals can become closer to their pets and spend more time with them. When among friends, activities such as cooking or exercising together help the victim to become more aware of themselves to find the courage to face their ordeal. It is in such relationships that people find a reason to laugh and get rid of stressors. Reading, meditating, and doing assignment are some of the relational activities that can help an individual to move out of the norm. Cognitive strategies include the use of premeditated distractions like movies and listening to music to distract one’s mind from stressors. Cognitive strategies limit the mind from traumatic experiences (Patricia et al., 2013). When among friends, one can focus on different topics that are unrelated to traumatic experiences. Some individuals may prefer meditation practices to remain present and calm their mind from deep thoughts. Others focus on concentrating on the positive occurrences in life to cheer them up. Other individuals focus on prayers and worship for spiritual nourishment to enable them to stay positive.

The overall strategies can be combined into one common group of stress management. An individual with experience in trauma needs to exercise stress management to prevent relapse (Alexis et al., 2019). Such individuals can find where their strengths lie and focus on it to remain positive. The activities, as mentioned above, act as boosters for tolerance, relaxation of the mind and discharge of negative energy. One can quickly recover from the trauma, minimize the possibility of burnouts, and releasing excessive energy that can lead to stress.

Conclusion

Self-care is vital to healing from trauma. It is an individual effort to ensure that all stressors are eliminated to avoid traumatic experiences. An individual can use friends, relatives, coworkers, and partners to confide on their emotions and stressful feelings that might lead to trauma. For an active recovery, self-care is an impetus to therapy and self-recovery. As such, care providers should focus on self-care more than therapeutic activities to enhance positive feelings.

References

Alexis, G. et al. (2019). Integrating self-care into clinical practice with trauma clients. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(1): 48-56, doi:10.1080/10911359.2018.1473189

Dorothy, E. (2017). Optimizing Empathy: Physician self-care as a crucial component of trauma-informed treatment. Journal of Lifelong Learning Psychiatry, 15(4): 432-434. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519522/

Patricia, J. et al. (2013). Developing Self-Care Practices in a Trauma Treatment Course. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(3): 440-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.917932

Self-Care Image retrieved on June 15, 2020, from: http://www.empowerireland.ie/uncategorized/self-care-in-social-care-vicarious-trauma-vicarious-resilience-and-self-compassion/attachment/highway-signpost-self-care/

Children with Adverse Experiences

By cboone24June 17th, 2020in CJ 720

Childhood trauma is much more common than we perceive. Each year millions of children across the United States experience some sort of trauma whether it is child abuse, neglect,  exposure to violence, family alcohol or drug abuse, or poverty. It is great that we as a society know about the millions of children exposed to trauma, but what about the millions we do not know about? It is essential that we understand how childhood adversity creates negative, long-term effects on the child's mind and body. Turning a blind eye to childhood adversity has caused our nation to pay a tremendous human price, societal price, and economic price for the degree of childhood adversity and resilience our children experience.

 

In this article, the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health touches on the connection between brain structure and early experiences of trauma. The prefrontal cortex does not fully develop until about the age of 25 (Rousseau, 2020). The prefrontal cortex is responsible for a variety of complex cognitive behavior such as planning,  personality expression, decision making, and moderating social behavior (Rousseau,2020). When an individual experiences trauma it causes developmental issues in the prefrontal cortex. Childhood adversity leads to the inability to self regulate emotion and disrupts healthy development in adulthood (Children Health, 2017). It also causes behavioral, emotional, school, and health problems during childhood and adolescence (Children Health, 2017). There is an 80% likelihood that if exposed to one of these categories as a child, an individual will experience alcoholism and alcohol abuse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, drug use, heart disease, liver disease, risk of partner violence, smoking, suicide, and overall a decline in a healthy and robust quality of life (Rousseau, 2020). 

 

Unlike many articles on Childhood adversity,  the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health discusses the connection between resilience and children with adverse experiences. Resilience is defined as an adaptive response to hardship. In other words, a child's ability to recover and cope with adverse experiences. Many researchers do not touch on the topic of resilience, however it may play a major role in adverse childhood experiences. The Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health explains that resilience involves a combination of internal and external factors (Children Health, 2017). Understanding the factors involved with resilience and how resilience is strengthened contributes to allowing society to better support a child recovering from trauma. 

 

As mentioned previously, each year millions of children across the United States experience some sort of trauma. The Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health does not simply discuss the adverse childhood experiences, but policy implications designed to help to prevent ACEs, as well as to ensure early identification and intervention for parents and children affected by trauma (Children Health, 2017).  In the end, the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health demonstrates how developing policies and program options to help prevent, interrupt, and mitigate the effects of childhood adversity contributes to our ability to protect these children. 

 

References :

“Childhood Adversity and Resilience Summary.” Kidsdata.org, 2017,    

       www.kidsdata.org/topic/95/childhood-adversity-and-resilience/summary?gclid=EAIaIQo

       bChMIt7GbiqWF6gIVB0WGCh0zRAV0EAAYASAAEgIzWfD_BwE.

Rousseau, D. (2020). Module 2: Childhood Trauma. Retrieved from

        https://onlinecampus.bu.edu/ultra/courses/_65989_1/cl/outline

Treatments for Trauma

By meganb21June 17th, 2020in CJ 720

There are a variety of treatments available for those who suffer from trauma. The three most common treatments are therapy, medications and holistic treatments. Forms of therapy can include cognitive behavior therapy, exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Medication can include anxiety medications, anti-depressants, and mood stabilizing medications. Some holistic treatments for someone who has experienced trauma can include meditation, yoga, acupuncture and other forms of physical activity.

While some individuals may prefer medications to help them overcome a past trauma, others may choose a form of therapy. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a form of psychological treatment that has been demonstrated to be effective for a range of problems including depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol and drug use problems, and mental illnesses. CBT is conducted by repeatedly exposing patients to the stimulus they fear without bad things actually happening. Over time the patient will gradually become less upset or fearful, and the bad memories will then be associated with “corrective” information of being safe (van der kolk, 2015). In Professor Rousseau’s lecture she discusses how CBT helps patients unlearn their negative reactions to thoughts and replacing them with new emotional and behavioral responses in situations they find challenging (Rousseau, 2020). The goal of cognitive behavior therapy is to teach people that while they cannot control every aspect of the world around them, they can take control of how they interpret and deal with things in their environment.

Exposure therapy is great option for veterans or sexual abuse survivors. This form of therapy helps victims overcome whatever fear or trauma they are experiencing. The four stages of exposure therapy are: education, breathing, real world exposure and talking through the trauma. I believe each stage serves a different purpose and allows the patient to not only talk through their trauma, but also learn techniques on how to overcome their trauma (Rousseau, 2020). Although being exposed to their fear or trauma can be very challenging, it is done in a safe and controlled environment, to allow the patient to feel as comfortable as possible, but also getting them outside of their comfort zone, and become comfortable with being uncomfortable.

The last therapeutic approach that can help with trauma is Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR). EMDR is a form of psychotherapy that is often used to treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. It incorporates methods from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in addition to adding bilateral stimulation through Rapid Eye Movements (REM) (Roussea, 2020). When REM is incorporated into therapy, the patient will bring forth the traumatic memory as they recall how they are feeling. EMDR’s focus is to regulate the memory but also restore the memory throughout the patient’s body and mind (van der Kolk, 2014, pp 258). EMDR consists of eight different phases including history taking, preparation, assessment, desensitization, installation, body scan, and reevaluation (Rousseau, 2020). Without discussing each of these phases in detail, the individual ultimately brings up the negative memory and discusses surrounding emotions, senses, and negative beliefs that they experienced.

Many studies have found that both CBT and EMDR therapy are the most effective therapies for treating patients with PTSD associated trauma. I believe that EMDR is a great option for many patients who have been exposed to trauma because I believe that its eight-phase system is well thought out and each phase holds a specific purpose. While a form of therapy may not be the best option for you, there are many other ways to help assist you overcome trauma.

 

Rousseau, D. (2020). Module 4.6. [Lecture Notes]. Boston University. https://onlinecampus.bu.edu/ultra/courses/_65989_1/cl/outline

Van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Penguin Books.

 

Protesting and The Vicarious Trauma That Can Result From It.

By Raceel PascallJune 17th, 2020in CJ 720
Protesters Clash With Minneapolis Police After George Floyd’s Death on May 26, 2020

In this day and age we as a nation are facing unprecedented times. From the spread of a new virus which is causing many unforeseen deaths to the protests, riots, and violence taking place due to the alarming death of George Floyd, it appears to be one traumatic event after another. The death of George Floyd has brought out numerous people around the world to stand up for the injustice and racism that took place. Many people questioned why now? Why such a large body of people for George Floyd? He is not the first African American to die in police custody. Frank Leon Roberts, an activist who teaches a course on the Black Lives Matter movement at New York University mentions that there are a number of different factors that can answer those questions.

Floyd’s death was particularly “gruesome, obvious, and clearly recorded on video as opposed to previous instances of police violence where there was partial view of what happened, or the police officer says they made a split-second decision because they feared for their life”. Floyd’s death comes during a pandemic and high unemployment, Roberts states “the US’s 13% unemployment level means that more people than usual can protest and campaign without juggling work commitments”. Floyd’s death also came shortly after the deaths of Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor and is considered the last straw.  Also, the action of the police which forcibly removed peaceful protesters from a square outside of the White House can be considered another reason why many people come out to protest (Cheung, 2020).

Police targeted journalists covering the
George Floyd protests on May 31, 2020

When we look at media outlets during the last three weeks we see protests all over the U.S. both peaceful and violent. The violent protests depict by both photographs and videos a sense of fear, outrage, sadness, and disgust to the viewer. Watching these photographs and videos of real-life violence can cause vicarious trauma for many people both adults and children. Some who may have been personally affected by these experiences in the past and are reliving them again today.

The experience of trauma does not need to be direct to have an impact on us. Just being witness to trauma in this course can be challenging (Rousseau, 2020).  Vicarious traumatization has been known to affect mental health providers, first responders, medical professionals, and other professionals who are exposed to trauma daily. Yet, according to the U.S. Veterans Administration, research generally finds an association between watching media coverage of traumatic events and stress symptoms.  Research also found that traumatic materials in the media can lead observers to experience anxiety, difficulties in coping, immense fear, and feelings of helplessness, especially in children (USVA, 2020).

Protests get violent in New York City on May 31, 2020

Dr. Stephanie Moulton Sarkis, a Tampa-based therapist and expert in the psychological effect of trauma, mentions that “a lot of people are reporting having nightmares about being abused by police right now.” This is proving to be true amongst many therapists. Dr. Sarkis continues to state that during this time she has seen patients that who have been victims of domestic violence and have say that watching footage is bringing up issues relating to when they have been victimized (Seitz, 2020).

These protests, riots, and violence that is taking place are causing vicarious trauma to both citizens and law enforcement officers. According to a study published by the Pew Research Center, more than three-quarters of U.S. law enforcement officers say they are reluctant to use force when necessary, and nearly as many (72%) say they or their colleagues are more reluctant to stop and question people who seem suspicious as a result of increased scrutiny of police stemming from the death of Michael Brown in 2014 (Madhani, 2017). These same effects can be expected from the death of George Floyd. It effects everyone’s day to day lives.

The media is something we can not get away from. News is presented to us through so many platforms like television coverage, social media, the internet, radio, and newspapers. There is no way to eliminate the news and the vicarious trauma it brings. You have to try to come to an understanding that bad things happen in this world and sometimes to specific individuals. Limit yourself to what you view and protect yourselves from the trauma it may bring by identifying any warning signs and talking about your feelings with a professional, friend, or loved one. This can be a start to addressing the symptoms of vicarious trauma.

Reference

Cheung, H. (2020, June 8). George Floyd death: Why US protests are so powerful this time. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52969905

Madhani, A. (2017, Jan. 11).'Ferguson effect': 72% of U.S. cops reluctant to make stops. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/11/ferguson-effect-study-72-us-cops-reluctant-make-stops/96446504/

Rousseau, D. (2020). Module 1: Introduction to Trauma. Retrieved from https://onlinecampus.bu.edu/webapps/blackboard/execute/displayLearningUnit?course_id=_65989_1&content_id=_7783428_1&framesetWrapped=true

Seitz, M. (2020, June 9). The Quiet Trauma of Watching Police Brutality on Our Screens. Retrieved from https://www.vulture.com/2020/06/police-brutality-footage-vicarious-trauma.html

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/care/toolkits/provider/workingWithTraumaSurvivors.asp