Call for Papers: SCS 2025

Hidden Labor and Precarity in the Roman World
Lorenza Bennardo (University of Toronto) and Rebecca Moorman (Boston University), organizers

The realities of labor are often hidden in the ancient Roman world. Writers exalt the virtues of hardworking Republican farmers (Livy 3.26), the productivity of an idealized pastoral landscape (Verg. Ecl. 4; Longus 1.2-11), and the labor of philosophical inquiry (Lucr. DRN 2.730). Recognizing antiquity’s unseen labor often requires radically new perspectives. In Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, the human-turned-donkey Lucius recounts the horrific state of human and animal slaves at a mill (9.11-13). Emaciated humans display vivid welts while animal hooves are painfully widened from constant circuits around the mill. The material evidence of forced human and animal labor is newly perceptible to the lector scrupulosus from Lucius’ “humanimal state” (Chesi and Spiegel 2019 with Haraway 2016), a posthuman perspective that decenters anthropocentric experience to reveal a spectrum of involuntary interspecies production.

Extending discussions into ancient Rome’s “weaker voices” (Matzner and Harrison 2019), this panel seeks new approaches for decentering dominant perspectives (human, male, elite) to reveal the hidden labor of marginalized groups such as slaves, women, children, foreigners, and animals. We welcome papers that explore any aspect of Roman antiquity’s unseen labor (physical, emotional, intellectual, social, poetic, etc.), especially in ways that cut across traditional boundaries of both the classical Roman world and modern disciplines to consider, e.g., Greek, Egyptian, and other Roman-era literatures and cultures from literary, historical, and material perspectives. Papers might address one of the following questions:

How does the revelation of hidden labor break down distinctions between boundaries of the self (human/animal, free/unfree, gendered, geographic, racial or ethnic, etc.)?
What are the ancient terminologies for labor (labor, ἔργον, bꜣk)? What are the varying linguistic and cultural expressions of hidden labor in, e.g., Roman Egypt, Greece, Italy, Carthage, and/or Asia Minor?
How does social status affect perceptions of artistic labor, e.g. in the slave theater of Roman comedy (Richlin 2017)? Is poetic labor something to show off or something to hide? What are the lost labors of poetic production?
How do elite representations of poetic production as otium obscure the economies of poetic production?
Where does the aestheticization of labor enhance or obscure ugly, shameful, and otherwise stigmatized production, e.g., slave and child labor (Laes 2011), sex work (Glazebrook 2015), patron-client relationships, reproductive labor (Geue 2021), or industries of death and dying (Richlin 2014; Bond 2020)?
What are the advantages or limitations of Marxist approaches, e.g. the simultaneous over- and underworking of the gimmick (Ngai 2020), in revealing antiquity’s hidden labor (Geue 2018; cf. Bernard 2020)?

Please submit an abstract of no more than 500 words (excluding bibliography) by February 15, 2024 to info@classicalstudies.org with the panel title in the subject line; do not include your name in the text of the abstract. Abstracts will be judged anonymously.