Our NSF-funded research leverages insights from the science of science communication to build a multi-stage, multi-method, and multidisciplinary research agenda aimed at rigorously identifying (1) how health agencies have made an effort to encourage vaccine uptake for three vaccines (COVID-19, seasonal influenza, and tetanus) in the past, and (2) the degree to which those efforts are successful. The research accomplishes the first objective by employing \u201cbig data\u201d content analytic procedures developed by the research team to identify themes and message design elements present in past efforts to encourage vaccine uptake from federal and local health agencies. The project then assesses the effectiveness of past vaccine promotion efforts via a series of randomized controlled trials embedded in public opinion surveys; including (a) a \u201cpilot phase\u201d conjoint experimental study embedded in a longitudinal survey capable of assessing the effectiveness of several hundred different messaging strategies, (b) a \u201cconfirmatory phase\u201d factorial experiment \u2013 embedded in a nationally representative cross-sectional study \u2013 testing the effectiveness of the most promising interventions identified in the pilot phase, and (c) an \u201cimplementation phase\u201d field experiment \u2013 conducted in partnership with market research agencies \u2013 that administers our most effective treatments identified in our \u201cconfirmatory phase\u201d on search engine platforms. In the study\u2019s field experimental phase, the researchers will evaluate the effect of vaccine promotion messages on both verified vaccine uptake data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as well as individual vaccine uptake self-reports from state-level opinion surveys deployed across a randomly-selected set of treatment zip codes, within treated counties, and among a representative sample of five U.S. states.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Our NSF-funded research leverages insights from the science of science communication to build a multi-stage, multi-method, and multidisciplinary research agenda aimed at rigorously identifying (1) how health agencies have made an effort to encourage vaccine uptake for three vaccines (COVID-19, seasonal influenza, and tetanus) in the past, and (2) the degree to which those efforts […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23921,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/no-sidebars.php","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/345"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23921"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/345\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":462,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/345\/revisions\/462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/healthpolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}