loading slideshow...<\/p><\/div>
![\"Dr.](\"\/emsconf\/files\/2019\/06\/ems-conf-001-636x477.jpg\")
![\"Academics](\"\/emsconf\/files\/2019\/06\/ems-conf-002-636x477.jpg\")
![\"Academics](\"\/emsconf\/files\/2019\/06\/ems-conf-003-636x477.jpg\")
![\"Dr.](\"\/emsconf\/files\/2019\/06\/ems-conf-004-636x424.jpg\")
- 1<\/span><\/a><\/li>
- 2<\/span><\/a><\/li>
- 3<\/span><\/a><\/li>
- 4<\/span><\/a><\/li> <\/ul><\/div>
<\/a><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/p>\n
\nApril 10th: Human Community and Perpetual Contact in an Era of Artificial Intelligence<\/h2>\n
This Invitational Expert Panel on April 10th investigates the future of perpetual contact from a humanities, philosophical and social scientific perspective. Questions include: How does the increased prevalence of algorithmically-informed communication technologies influence us as humans? How do we share and receive information in the smart home? What are the implications for social and domestic relationships? What role should philosophy and other humanistic disciplines play in understanding these phenomena? Expert scholars will contribute to a lively discussion, interrogating implications of our current algorithmic culture.<\/p>\n
International Scientific Advisory Board*<\/h3>\n
- \n
- Arruda Filho, Emilio (University of Amazon)<\/li>\n
- Betke, Margrit (Boston University)<\/li>\n
- Bucy, Erik (Texas Tech University)<\/li>\n
- de Souza e Silva, Adriana (North Carolina State University)<\/li>\n
- Floyd, Juliet (Boston University)<\/li>\n
- Liu, Yu-li (National Chengchi University)<\/li>\n
- Neff, Gina (Oxford University)<\/li>\n
- Redman, Philip (Accenture)<\/li>\n
- Serrano Teller\u00eda, Ana (Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha)<\/li>\n
- Soysal, Zeynep (University of Rochester)<\/li>\n
- Takahashi, Toshie (Waseda University, Tokyo)<\/li>\n
- Tian, Li (Peking University)<\/li>\n
- Wild, Claude (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe)<\/li>\n
- Xie, Xinzhou (Peking University)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
*Institutional affiliation presented for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement<\/em><\/p>\n
\nApril 11th: Should Robots Be Our Friends? Ethical and social scientific implications of the growing emotional engagement of humans with AI agents and robots<\/h2>\n
Robots and other artificial intelligence (AI) entities have long tempted people to treat them as if they were alive, human-like, or even had souls (Katz, 2003). This topic is now front and center as people increasingly welcome AI and robots into their lives as conversational partners, servants, and companions. More, the concept of artificial intelligence has served as a catalyst for artists, philosophers, mathematicians, and psychologists to examine the defining characteristics of consciousness and what it means to be human, such as Hobbes (1651), Turing (1950), and Searle (1980).<\/p>\n
Today, much of what was initially conceptualized as fiction has materialized as a technological reality. As artificial technologies become more increasingly prevalent in contemporary life, it is necessary for researchers to examine the potential implications with regard to ethics (Anderson & Anderson, 2012; Lin, Abney, & Bekey, 2014; Taddeo & Floridi, 2018), identity and social relationships (Breazeal, 1999, 2003, 2004; Turkle, 1995) sex and love (Levy, 2007; Sullins, 2012), education and development (Resnick, 1998; Kahn et al. 2012) and labor and economy (Boyd & Holton, 2017; Crawford & Joler, 2018).<\/p>\n
In order to more fully understand the complexities of AI and its social consequences, the Division of Emerging Media Studies at Boston University presents an international symposium, where scholars from a variety of fields will discuss the promises and perils. An interdisciplinary, cross-cutting approach will help to facilitate an in-depth examination of the topic through paper presentations, panel discussions, and a poster session. The symposium will encourage the audience to participate actively with questions and debate. We will also try to showcase some of the latest technology.<\/p>\n
The goal of the event is for participants to not only develop an enhanced understanding of the competing issues at play but also identify actionable next steps within their fields of study. Finally, the social psychological and ethical dimensions will be delineated in pursuit of a greater understanding of the nettlesome issues that we as a society will be facing.<\/p>\n
Reference<\/h3>\n
- \n
- Anderson, M. & Anderson, S. L. (Eds.). (2011). Machine ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<\/li>\n
- Boyd, R., & Holton, R. J. (2017). Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation? Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 331-345.<\/li>\n
- Breazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1-2), 119-155.<\/li>\n
- Breazeal, C. L. (2004). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.<\/li>\n
- Breazeal, C. (1999). Robot in society: Friend or appliance. In Proceedings of the 1999 Autonomous Agents Workshop on Emotion-Based Agent Architectures (pp. 18-26).<\/li>\n
- Crawford, K. & Joler, V. (2018 September 17). Anatomy of an AI system: The Amazon Echo as an anatomical map of human labor, data and planetary resources. AI Now Institute and Share Lab. Retrieved from: https:\/\/anatomyof.ai<\/li>\n
- Hobbes, T. and Gaskin, J. (1998). Leviathan. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n
- Kahn Jr, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … & Shen, S. (2012). \u201cRobovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now\u201d: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303-314.<\/li>\n
- Katz, James E. (Ed.), (2003). Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.<\/li>\n
- Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. A. (2014). Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.<\/li>\n
- Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 43-55.<\/li>\n
- Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,3(3), 417-424.<\/li>\n
- Sullins, J. P. (2012). Robots, love and sex: the ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(4), 398-409.<\/li>\n
- Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good. Science, 361(6404), 751-752.<\/li>\n
- Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236),.433-460.<\/li>\n
- Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nJoint Sponsors<\/h2>\n
Sponsored by:<\/h4>\n
- \n
- The Feld Family Professorship of Boston University\u2019s College of Communication<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Co-Sponsored by:<\/h4>\n
- \n
- Division of Emerging Media Studies, Boston University<\/li>\n
- The Consulate General of France in Boston<\/li>\n
- Artificial Intelligence Research (AIR) of Boston University<\/li>\n
- The Mellon Foundation Sawyer Seminar<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
We gratefully acknowledge our sponsors.<\/p>\n
\nSchedule of Events<\/h2>\n
- The Feld Family Professorship of Boston University\u2019s College of Communication<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- 2<\/span><\/a><\/li>
![\"Dr.](\"\/emsconf\/files\/2019\/06\/dems-conf-katz-banner.jpg\")