{"id":1215,"date":"2020-06-01T16:26:34","date_gmt":"2020-06-01T20:26:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/?p=1215"},"modified":"2020-06-01T16:26:34","modified_gmt":"2020-06-01T20:26:34","slug":"the-waiting-game-supreme-courts-decision-on-the-lawfulness-of-the-deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-daca-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/2020\/06\/01\/the-waiting-game-supreme-courts-decision-on-the-lawfulness-of-the-deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-daca-program\/","title":{"rendered":"The Waiting Game: Supreme Court’s Decision on the Lawfulness of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program"},"content":{"rendered":"

As May 2020 comes to an end, many eagerly await a Supreme Court decision<\/span><\/a> that could affect the futures of thousands of DACA recipients and shape <\/span>immigration policy<\/span><\/a> as we know it. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)<\/span><\/a> is the program that is currently under scrutiny; in particular the Supreme Court will be deciding on the following two issues: (1) \u201cWhether or not the Trump administration\u2019s decision to end DACA can be reviewed by the courts at all?\u201d and (2) \u201cWhether or not the Trump administration\u2019s termination of DACA was lawful?\u201d<\/span><\/a> This program was first instituted under the Obama Administration as an executive action<\/span><\/a> to do the following for qualified Dreamers who completed the process of a first-time or renewal application: (1)<\/span><\/a> protection from deportation for a time period, and (2)<\/span><\/a> work authorization for a set period of time.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

During the Obama Administration, the DREAM Act of 2010<\/span><\/a> (H.R. 6497) was proposed and passed in the House but did not pass the Senate<\/span><\/a>. The purpose<\/span><\/a>, like its other variations, was intended to aid<\/span><\/a> undocumented individuals by providing them a way to eventually reach legal status,<\/span><\/a> because they were brought to the United States when they were children and have to live with a continued sense of uncertainty<\/span><\/a> that attaches to being undocumented. In its stead, the Obama Administration designed<\/span><\/a> a temporary solution<\/span><\/a>, which came to be known as DACA, in which an individual could qualify by meeting a series of requirements (i.e. arriving in the United States before they turned sixteen years old<\/span><\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span>This policy gave a lot of individuals hope, but everything changed with the arrival of the Trump Administration<\/span><\/a>. The Trump Administration\u2019s policies quickly took on an anti-immigration rhetoric, and his Administration rescinded<\/span><\/a> the policy on the basis that it was illegal. Thereafter, lawsuits followed with Department of Homeland Security, et al., v. Regents of the University of California, et al.<\/span><\/a> reaching the Supreme Court level<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Regarding the two issues laid out above<\/span><\/a>, there are many ways<\/span><\/a> the decision could go, but the one that would have the worst effect on DACA recipients would be the court siding on the Trump Administration\u2019s side in saying that \u201cDACA was an unconstitutional use of presidential power to begin with<\/span><\/a>.\u201d This could have a devastating impact<\/span><\/a> on DACA recipients especially at a time when they find themselves in the midst of the COVID-19 global pandemic alongside the rest of the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, ABC News quotes a college student saying \u201cAs a DACA recipient, and everything going on with COVID-19 and as well with the Supreme Court ruling coming at any time — It’s been very stressful.\u201d<\/span><\/a> On top of college, she works with authorization under DACA, but COVID-19 has added other stressors as she finds herself as the only provider at home<\/span><\/a>. Ending DACA at a time like this would end up being very challenging and harmful for individuals like these who are trying to stay afloat during this pandemic.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Nevertheless, as this country struggles to recover from this pandemic, the most <\/span>interesting development<\/span><\/a> has happened to this <\/span>Supreme Court<\/span><\/a> case showing how vital Dreamers and immigrants have been to making this country function smoothly despite the havoc wreaked by the virus. A CNN report discusses how: <\/span>\u201cA letter sent to the Supreme Court states approximately 27,000 Dreamers are health care workers — including 200 medical students, physician assistants, and doctors — some of whom are now on the front lines in hospitals across the country.\u201d<\/span><\/a> The Supreme Court <\/span>agreed<\/span><\/a> to take this brief into consideration, and it makes one wonder whether the timing of the decision during a pandemic and the supplemental brief<\/span><\/a> will have any impact at all?<\/span><\/p>\n

Despite the <\/span>positive contributions<\/span><\/a> of these and other essential individuals, there have been a lot of issues that have also surfaced reflecting further difficulties that Dreamers are enduring. An example of this is\u00a0<\/span>federal funding under CARES Act<\/span><\/a>. The pandemic has had even more disastrous effects on particular communities, and though the <\/span>Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020<\/span><\/a> was passed with a part of it designed to provide aid and federal dollars to help students, and yet the benefits are not available<\/span><\/a> to everyone. DACA students could not qualify<\/span><\/a> to receive money under this Act, and it was one of the reasons the Democrats reached out<\/span><\/a> to Secretary DeVos to change the language but to no avail. The House has brought another bill to the forefront, the Heroes Act<\/span><\/a>, which proposes many changes<\/span><\/a>; one aspect of which directly seeks to overturn \u201cSecretary DeVos\u2019s decision to exclude DACA students from the emergency aid<\/span><\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span>This is a hopeful change, <\/span><\/a> but the culmination of issues including the Supreme Court decision<\/span><\/a> yet to be released, the uncertainty of COVID-19<\/span><\/a> on employment, health, and education, and a delay<\/span><\/a> in passing the House bill paints a bleak picture.<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet, at the end of the day, it is as Antonio Alarcon described it on CNN: <\/span>\u201cWe\u2019re hopeful that the Supreme Court will see the humanity of our stories and see the humanity of our families, because at the end of the day, this is a nation of immigrants.\u201d<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Nabaa Khan<\/strong> anticipates graduating from Boston University School of Law in May 2021.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As May 2020 comes to an end, many eagerly await a Supreme Court decision that could affect the futures of thousands of DACA recipients and shape immigration policy as we know it. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is the program that is currently under scrutiny; in particular the Supreme Court will be deciding […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17929,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[375,10,4],"tags":[346,339,148,390,389,388],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1215"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17929"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1215"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1231,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1215\/revisions\/1231"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.bu.edu\/dome\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}