<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tell-Tale Brain from the neurObama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.bu.edu/ombs/2011/02/11/the-tell-tale-brain-from-the-neurobama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.bu.edu/ombs/2011/02/11/the-tell-tale-brain-from-the-neurobama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 03:08:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernie Carra</title>
		<link>http://sites.bu.edu/ombs/2011/02/11/the-tell-tale-brain-from-the-neurobama/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie Carra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/ombs/?p=1657#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Some genuinely fantastic content on this internet site, appreciate it for contribution. &quot;Such evil deeds could religion prompt.&quot; by Lucretius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some genuinely fantastic content on this internet site, appreciate it for contribution. &#8220;Such evil deeds could religion prompt.&#8221; by Lucretius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Montanye</title>
		<link>http://sites.bu.edu/ombs/2011/02/11/the-tell-tale-brain-from-the-neurobama/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Montanye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/ombs/?p=1657#comment-712</guid>
		<description>One thing I would like to say is the fact that before getting more pc memory, consider the machine into which it is installed. When the machine is actually running Windows XP, for instance, the particular memory threshold is 3.25GB. Adding above this would merely constitute a waste. Make certain that one&#039;s mother board can handle the particular upgrade amount, as well. Thanks for your blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I would like to say is the fact that before getting more pc memory, consider the machine into which it is installed. When the machine is actually running Windows XP, for instance, the particular memory threshold is 3.25GB. Adding above this would merely constitute a waste. Make certain that one&#8217;s mother board can handle the particular upgrade amount, as well. Thanks for your blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitchounts</title>
		<link>http://sites.bu.edu/ombs/2011/02/11/the-tell-tale-brain-from-the-neurobama/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitchounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/ombs/?p=1657#comment-711</guid>
		<description>I too feel guilty for not broadcasting Ramachandran&#039;s scheduled appearance to the neuro community at BU. Perhaps he&#039;ll be promoting a new book in a year or two....

Over-confidence in new research findings is troubling. It doesn&#039;t help that science journalists at the major newspapers routinely report on &quot;groundbreaking research&quot; with an unhealthy dose of exaggerated claims. Even those that include disclaimers about the tentative nature of the findings may unwittingly be hyping the general public into believing unestablished findings.

Do you think this is a legitimate threat to the public&#039;s knowledge and perception of science? If so, what should be done to change this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too feel guilty for not broadcasting Ramachandran&#8217;s scheduled appearance to the neuro community at BU. Perhaps he&#8217;ll be promoting a new book in a year or two&#8230;.</p>
<p>Over-confidence in new research findings is troubling. It doesn&#8217;t help that science journalists at the major newspapers routinely report on &#8220;groundbreaking research&#8221; with an unhealthy dose of exaggerated claims. Even those that include disclaimers about the tentative nature of the findings may unwittingly be hyping the general public into believing unestablished findings.</p>
<p>Do you think this is a legitimate threat to the public&#8217;s knowledge and perception of science? If so, what should be done to change this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
